"Just thought I’d send an email to say how tremendously appreciative I am of all the hard work you put in for [client], he’s incredibly lucky to have had you representing him, you’re such a credit to your profession and everyone I’ve met has spoken so highly of you, so thank you so much for everything."

"I am incredibly grateful for the way Sabrina Neves handled my case. She was exceptional throughout, and I couldn’t be happier with the result. I would wholeheartedly recommend her to anyone. Her dedication and passion for her work truly stand out, and she consistently kept me updated and informed at every stage. This is exactly the level of care and professionalism you hope for in a solicitor. Thank you sincerely for all your support and service."

"From the first time i spoke to someone at GT Stewart i felt very confident they could help us we have never needed a Criminal Solicitor before they were very quick in asking for things from us and the prosecution my husband was looking at minimum 18 months prison sentence for something he was innocent for from our first court case we then contacted Gt Stewart who went through the whole process with us on our next court date it was thrown out of court because we had such a good team i would highly recommend them our solicitor was Sabrina and our case worker was Wendy."

"Sabrina exhibited a genuine commitment to my case and the public interest: she was extremely professional, knowledgeable and understanding, putting justice first with the procedural tools at her disposal. I am extremely satisfied with the outcome of the matter and would recommend GT Stewart to anyone as a result of her determination, willingness and hard work. It's actually hard to use mere words to applaud the excellence I encountered."

“Just thought I’d send an email to say how tremendously appreciative I am of all the hard work you put in for [client], he’s incredibly lucky to have had you representing him, you’re such a credit to your profession and everyone I’ve met has spoken so highly of you, so thank you so much for everything.“

• Police Station Accreditation

• Duty Solicitor Qualification

• Higher Rights of Audience (Criminal)

• Advocacy and Vulnerable Witness Training

R v C

Represented a young adult charged with murder.

R v G

Represented a young adult who had been charged with S.18 GBH and possession of an offensive weapon following a stabbing.

R v F

Represented a vulnerable adult who had been charged with possession of a firearm with intent to endanger life and possession of ammunition with intent to engager life following a shooting.

R v R

Represented a child charged with 10 offences relating to the supply of class A drugs. R was a victim of child criminal exploitation. Following written representations, the Crown discontinued all 10 offences.

R v N, N & H

Represented three vulnerable Vietnamese nationals of good character who had been charged with offences relating to supplying class B drugs after they were found in a cannabis factory containing cannabis valued at in excess of £1million. All three were victims of modern slavery. Following two days of legal argument, the Court stayed the proceedings as an abuse of process after the Crown Prosecution Service failed to apply its guidance on prosecuting victims of modern slavery.

R v A

Represented a young adult of good character charged with offences of making and distributing indecent images of children and possession of extreme pornography. The offences dated back to when our client was a child. Despite lengthy representations to the Crown Prosecution Service, they refused to withdraw the charges, so the matter was set down for an abuse of process argument. The day before the abuse of process argument was due to take place, the Crown Prosecution Service confirmed that they would be offering no evidence. Not guilty verdicts were recorded by the Court, and our client remained a young adult of good character.

R v R

Represented a child who pleaded guilty to an offence of possession of an offensive weapon whilst represented by another firm of solicitors. Sabrina successfully applied to re-open the conviction, and R was found not guilty at trial after Sabrina made submissions that R had no case to answer.

R v R

Represented a child who was one of eight young people charged with violent disorder. The incident attracted news coverage. Following representations, the CPS discontinued the case against R.

R v L

Represented a child with complex needs who had been charged with seven offences of assaulting an emergency worker. All charges were withdrawn by the CPS following representations.

R v J

Represented J, who had been charged with offences of possession with intent to supply class A drugs. The police alleged that J had discarded a package, which was later recovered and found to contain class A drugs. Following a four-day trial, J was unanimously acquitted by the jury.

R v J

Represented a vulnerable young adult of good character who had been charged with possession with intent to supply class A drugs after being forced to sell drugs for 4 years. The CPS offered no evidence following written representations and the Court recorded not guilty verdicts.

R v V

Represented a client who had been charged with obstructing a police officer. The charges were withdrawn on the day of trial after it was argued that the officers were acting unlawfully.

R v A

Represented a client of good character charged with assaulting an emergency worker. The client was found not guilty following a full trial after submissions were made that the police were acting unlawfully and that there was, in fact, no assault.

R v C

Represented a vulnerable young adult who had been forced to sell drugs in order to clear a debt. The CPS offered no evidence following written representations, and the Court recorded not guilty verdicts.

R v L

Represented a young adult who was charged with offences relating to drugs supply, which dated back to when they were a child. The CPS offered no evidence following written representations, and not guilty verdicts were recorded.

• Crown Prosecution Service Withdraws Driving Offences at Croydon Youth Court Following Representations

• Crown Prosecution Service withdraws offence at Croydon Youth Court following service of a Pre-Action Protocol letter

• Crown Prosecution Service agrees to an out of court resolution following service of a pre action protocol letter

• Crown Prosecution Service withdraws offences following pre action protocol letter

• Crown Prosecution Service offer no evidence at Kingston Crown Court

• Leadership Influence and Inclusivity Awards 2025

• Crown Prosecution Service offer no evidence at Highbury Corner Youth Court

• GT Stewart Solicitors shortlisted for Rising Star at the Leadership, Influence & Inclusivity Awards!

• Crown Prosecution Service discontinue self-defence case at Croydon Youth Court

• Crown Prosecution Service offers no evidence in bladed article case at Croydon Crown Court

• Crown Prosecution Service offers no evidence in joint enterprise case at Croydon Youth Court

• Successful use of defence of insanity in GBH case at Inner London Crown Court

• Crown Prosecution Service discontinue case at Ealing Youth Court following representations

• Crown Prosecution Service discontinue case at Croydon Youth Court following service of pre-action protocol letter

• Crown Prosecution Service discontinue proceedings at Wimbledon Magistrates’ Court

• Not Guilty verdicts at Inner London Crown Court

• Crown agree to an out of court disposal following pre-action protocol letters

• Client acquitted after re-trial in sexual assault case at Inner London Crown Court

• Successful application to dismiss at Kingston Crown Court