We represented a client in proceedings where the prosecution sought to invoke the “slip rule” under section 385 of the Sentencing Act 2020.

We represented a client who was unlawfully detained for almost 24 hours due to faulty electronic tagging equipment.

We represented a client who had been charged with two charges of possession of bladed articles, resulting in his acquittal.

We represented a vulnerable client who was charged with serious assault charges following her detention under the Mental Health Act.

We represented a client facing a serious firearms allegation carrying a substantial custodial sentence, leading to a not guilty verdict.