Loading...
Child Protection Conferences2024-02-07T14:45:53+00:00

Child Protection Conferences

If a referral is made to the local authority regarding the safety of a child, the local authority must acknowledge receipt of such referral and decide the way forward within 1 working day of that referral being received.

What happens if I am reported to Social Services?

If a referral is made to the local authority regarding the safety of a child, the local authority must acknowledge receipt of such referral and decide the way forward within 1 working day of that referral being received.

If the local authority considers there is reasonable cause to suspect that a child is suffering or is likely to suffer significant harm, the local authority will undertake an assessment under s47 Children Act 1989.

The definition of significant harm is defined within the Children Act 1989 as:

“ill-treatment or the impairment of health or development including, for example, impairment suffered from seeing or hearing the ill-treatment of another.”

If the local authority identifies actual or likely significant harm, a strategy discussion must be convened.

What is a strategy discussion?

A strategy discussion will involve all professionals involved in the child’s life, such as their GP, school, nursery, etc.

The discussion allows these professionals to discuss what assessments may be necessary in order to promote the child’s safety and welfare, and who should complete these assessments. The professionals will also determine whether there has been any evidence of crime that requires investigation and whether a Child Protection Conference should be arranged.

What is a Child Protection Conference?

This is a meeting where all professionals are invited to meet. However, the parents and sometimes family members who play a significant role in the child’s life, will also be invited to attend this meeting. In some rare cases (where appropriate), the child is invited to attend also.

A Child Protection Conference is chaired by an Independent Reviewing Officer. The chair will meet with the parents and family prior to the conference commencing to explain the procedure.

The attendees to the meeting will discuss the concerns raised and determine how, moving forward, the child can be better protected. The professionals will individually voice their concerns and the parents will also have an opportunity to put forward their comments.

Professionals and parents then decide whether it is necessary for the child to be placed under a Child Protection Plan. Each individual will explain their reason for their decision.

What is a Child Protection Plan?

If professionals believe that the child is at continuing risk of harm, a plan will be prepared to assist in promoting that child’s welfare and improve their safety. It will outline the nature and source of each harm identified, what is requested to minimise that harm, who is responsible for implementing that work and when it is expected to be completed.

A lead professional will be chosen, who is usually the social worker. It is the lead professional’s job to ensure the plan is adhered to once put in place.

A Review Child Protection Conference should occur within 3 months of the initial conference date in order to review the progress of the plan put in place. If further review conferences are required, these should take place every 6 months.

Please see our free fact sheet on Child Protection Conferences that answers some commonly asked questions.

Free Fact Sheet

Our Family Services

Speak to a Lawyer in confidence 020 8299 6000

Securely message our Lawyers

Confidential Enquiry

“Whatever the odds, there’s a way”

Chambers Firm Logo 2

Our expert solicitors are ready to help

The Legal 500 – The Clients Guide to Law Firms

GT Stewart has established itself as a leading firm in the UK for criminal, housing, mental health and family law, specialising in private cases and also Legal Aid work.

We pride ourselves on regular referrals from other firms and agencies

We are known for our tenacity when representing those engaged in challenging the State or defending themselves against a prosecution.