Case Discontinued at Leeds Magistrates’ Court
GT Stewart Solicitors represented a client charged with one offence of criminal damage (contrary to section 1(1) of the CDA 1971). It was alleged our client smashed a television in a hospital.
GT Stewart Solicitors represented a client charged with one offence of criminal damage (contrary to section 1(1) of the CDA 1971). It was alleged our client smashed a television in a hospital.
At GT Stewart Solicitors we we recognise the insidious and negative effect of inequality and discrimination. We are passionate not only about protecting the rights of our clients, but the rights of the wider public too.
Max provides some insight into current concerns and recent developments that have arisen in the last couple of weeks.
Max considers the potential breaches of Article 6 and Article 8 Rights for those in care proceedings where the Court places reliance upon a report from the Suspected Inflicted Head Injury Service (SIHIS).
Our client instructed us to advise her regarding the validity of a Section 21 notice. We requested her homeless file from the council to assist with this, as the council had advised on a previous Section 21 notice as part of a homeless application, and therefore they may hold useful information.
"This was hugely disappointing meeting about the Suspected Inflicted Head Injury Service (SIHIS) by the Department for Education.
Ryan Booth, assisted by Ashley Smith & Harriet George represented a father in care proceedings where through proper cross examination of court appointed experts, the Court was able to conclude looking at the wider canvas evidence, that the baby’s injuries were not NAI.
GT Stewart Solicitors represented PS who was arrested and taken to Grimsby Police Station, where he was interviewed on suspicion of intentionally strangling his partner, assaulting her by banging her head on the floor and making threats to kill her.
From first appearance our client had the main homeless duty discharged in 2021 when she accepted a private rented sector offer and her housing waiting list account was closed.
Mr X was the secure tenant of a council property which suffered from disrepair including a serious mice infestation.