Case Against Our Client Under S4 of The Public Order Act Dismissed
The case against our client under S4 of the Public Order Act has been dismissed, after an unsuccessful application for an adjournment by the Prosecution.
The case against our client under S4 of the Public Order Act has been dismissed, after an unsuccessful application for an adjournment by the Prosecution.
Our client instructed us to request a suitability review of her new temporary accommodation. Her family has very complex needs, as two of her three children have autism and one has PICA syndrome like traits, meaning that he would try to eat both food and non-edible items.
GT Stewart represented a client who was arrested and interviewed by West Yorkshire Police in relation to an allegation of theft from a motor vehicle (contrary to Section 1 of the Theft Act of 1968).
In 2023 we were instructed by an elderly Spanish speaking client after she received a notice seeking possession from her landlord on the basis of rent arrears.
We represented a professional of previous good character who had been charged with an offence of being drunk and disorderly in a public place.
In April this year, we were instructed by Ms x after she received an accelerated claim form for possession from her landlord following receipt of a Section 21 Notice in December 2023.
Senior Solicitor Sophie Smith has successfully secured a suspended sentence for a client charged with multiple offences which included breaches of a Restraining Order
We represented a client who had been charged with offences of theft and handling stolen goods. It was the Crown’s case that our client and others had stolen a high value vehicle from the complainant’s driveway.
After a four day trial our client was found unanimously Not Guilty by a Winchester Crown Court jury, for a number domestic violence-related charges that he faced.
GT Stewart represented an ex-solider at trial following a brawl in North Macedonia which involved soldiers and civilians.