We represented a vulnerable client who had been charged with two offences of possessing bladed articles. Following a trial at City of London Magistrates’ Court, our client was acquitted of both charges.
Background
Our client pleaded Not Guilty to both allegations from the outset. Our team was briefed the night before the trial. Due to limited prior contact with our client, we took full instructions on the morning of the hearing before representing him at trial.
The Allegation
At the time, our client was homeless and was sleeping on the street. Following an incident at a café involving our client, Police attended the area where he was staying and located half a pair of scissors and a carving knife amongst his belongings. The prosecution alleged that he possessed both items without good reason.
Defence Case
Our client explained that he had been homeless at the time and kept all his belongings with him out of necessity. He had found the items discarded and used them for practical day-to-day purposes, including:
- Opening tins,
- Preparing food such as fruit,
- Managing day‑to‑day living without stable accommodation.
During the trial, we focused on the good reasons for possessing the items. The prosecution attempted to rely on unrelated allegations involving the incident at the café. However, we successfully intervened to prevent irrelevant material being raised.
Our client then gave evidence, during which the prosecution attempted to undermine his account in cross‑examination.
In our closing speech, we submitted that it was more likely than not that our client had good reason for carrying the knives.
Outcome
The Magistrates found the defence explanation credible and accepted that he had a lawful reason for possessing the items. He was acquitted of both charges.
Our client was represented by Solicitor, Adam Iqbal.
